Why are American newspapers in decline, the circulation plummeting, their
reputations in tatters, and their editorial decisions the subject of
denunciation?
The decision by New York Times and Los Angeles Times
to publish on June 23 the details of the Swift program --details which in
the opinion of most serious counterterrorism experts, will help
terrorists elude capture—is only the most recent of a long series of
press catastrophes that dog the print industry. Disgust at that decision
was at least in part cumulative, a widely shared shudder at the
self-proclaimed importance of the media generally and the big newspapers
specifically. The little people just aren’t buying it anymore –both
figuratively and literally, if whispers of the Los Angeles Times’
circulation numbers are to be believed.
There are plenty of pieces denouncing the MSM elites, and I have
written my share.
But few try and figure out what went wrong. I visited Columbia School
of Journalism in the fall to probe, and came away with some answers written up in the Weekly Standard.
That investigation looked at the future of MSM, not at its present.
How did the big papers go off the rails? After the repeated attempts
by New York Times’ editor Bill Keller and Los Angeles Times’ editor Dean Baquet to ex
plain themselves only dug their collective hole deeper, it began to
become obvious that the collapse of media credibility generally, and of
the big papers specifically, has to do with a crisis of leadership.
The papers don’t have any. Or rather, that which they have is weak:
weak minded and weak willed, prone to aggressiveness followed by
obsequiousness. Erratic. Impulsive and self-destructive.
Where does such leadership come from? An examination of the leadership
lineage of the four major dailies that are widely and correctly
understood to be very left of center in this country –the New York
Times, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe and the Los Angeles
Times—reveals that much of the dysfunction of these newsrooms may
fairly be traced to inbreeding among their elites.
The cloistered word of big papers breeds its own peculiar type of
leader, always selected from within the world of the big papers, always
carrying forward to the top the same assumptions of importance and
privilege, the same world view and indeed the same unusual combination of
arrogance and limited experience that defines big journalism. Here are
the brief histories of the top leadership posts at the big four:
The New York Times:
Bill Keller (2003 to present): A 1970 graduate of Pomona College,
Keller was on the student paper there and immediately went into
journalism as a reporter for Portland’s The Oregonian. After
stints with The Congressional Quarterly and the Dallas Times
Herald, Keller joined the New York Times in 1984 and has
been there since. He spent nearly a decade in the Moscow bureau, before
returning to New York in 1995 as the paper’s foreign editor. Passed over
for executive editor when Howell Raines was promoted to that post in
2002, Keller became an op-ed columnist and senior writer for the paper,
and was selected to lead it when Raines left after the Jayson Blair
scandal in 2003.
Howell Raines (2001 to 2003)
Raines grew up in Alabama, and is a 1964 graduate of
Birmingham-Southern College. He joined the Birmingham
Post-Herald the same year, but jumped to the local television
station WBRC in 1965. In 1970 it was back to papers, via the
Birmingham News, and in the same year, the Atlanta Constitution.
In 1976 he migrated to the St. Petersburg Times, and in 1978 was
recruited to the “big leagues” of journalism as he called it, and joined
the New York Times. He spent the next 25 years as a Timesman, in
jobs including Washington, D.C. bureau chief and national political
correspondent. He was selected as Executive Editor in 2001, a week before
9/11. He lasted less than two years when the Jayson Blair scandal brought
him down.
Joseph Lelyveld (1994 to 2001)
Lelyveld spent nearly 40 years at the New York Times,
beginning as a copy editor. Lelyveld told graduates of the Columbia
School of Journalism, from which he graduated, that he got into
journalism “having discovered that I had too short an attention span for
any respectable profession or form of scholarship.” After a stint in the
Army, Lelyveld enlisted in the Times and never left until retirement.
Max Frankel (1986 to 1994)
Frankel was also a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism,
where he also spent his undergraduate years. Like his predecessor,
Frankel began his 50 years working for the Times before he received his
diploma from college. He never left the paper, and served on its Board
after retirement from the newsroom.
A.M. Rosenthal (1977 to 1986)
Rosenthal took over the
leadership of the paper after having spent 34 years climbing the internal
ladder. Beginning in 1988, he combined his editor’s duties with column
writing, and after leaving the paper (after 56 years) began a column for
the New York Daily News. He was a 1943 graduate of City College,
and had begun working for the Times as a campus correspondent
even before graduation. Rosenthal was a foreign correspondent from 1954
to 1967, when he returned to New York and began a series of management
jobs that took ten years to get him to the top of the paper.
James Reston (1968 to 1969)
The legendary “Scotty” Reston began his journalism career with the
Springfield, Ohio Daily News and the AP in 1934, and joined the
Times in its London bureau in 1939. Except for a three year
leave of absence during World War II when Reston served in the U.S.
Office of War Information, he never left the Times.
Turner Catledge (1964 to 1968)
Catledge joined the Times in 1929, and spent 35 years working
towards the top. He never left the paper until his retirement.
The Washington Post
Leonard Downie, Jr. (1991 to present)
Downie joined the Washington Post as a summer intern in 1964,
and except for a year’s leave for a fellowship to study urban problems in
the U.S. and Europe, this Ohio State graduate has never not been in the
employ of the Post.
Benjamin C. Bradlee (1965 to 1991)
Bradlee’s a 1942 graduate of Harvard. He joined the Post in 1948, but
left in 1951 to become the assistant press attaché in the American
embassy in Paris, and from there went on to work for a number of years at
the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange. Hejoined Newsweek in 1953
and rejoined the Post later that decade. He became senior editor
of the paper in 1961, “managing editor” in 1965, and “executive editor”
in 1968.
The Boston Globe
Martin Baron (2001 to present)
Baron arrived at the Globe after a brief two years at the
head of the Miami Herald. The 1976 graduate of Lehigh University
had joined the Herald out of college, but left for the west
coast and a series of jobs with the Los Angeles Times in 1979.
He jumped to the New York Times in 1996 and spent three years
there before heading to Florida.
Matthew V. Storin (1993 to 2001)
Storin began his journalism career at the Springfield Daily
News in 1964, and moved to the Globe in 1969, where he was
a White House correspondent and and reported extensively from Asia before
joining management at the paper in 1982. Storin left the Globe
for stints at U.S. News & World Report, the Chicago Sun
Times, the Maine Times and the New York Daily News
before taking the leadership of the Globe in 1993.
John S. Driscoll (1987 to 1993)
Driscoll has spent decades at the Globe and was a caretaker
between the turbulence of the Janeway years and the arrival of Storin.
Driscoll graduated from Northeastern University in 1957 and joined the
paper after graduation, rising through its ranks in a variety of posts
including managing editor of the Evening Globe.
Michael Janeway (1984 to 1986)
Janeway came to the Globe in the late ‘70s after many years at the
Atlantic Monthly where he had risen to executive editor and to
which he had come from Newsweek and before that
Newsday. He headed the Sunday Globe prior to his
elevation to the top job 1986. Janeway spent a year as a special
assistant to Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, from 1977 to 1978.
Thomas Winship (1965 to 1984)
After his 1945 graduation from Harvard, Winship joined the staff of
the Washington Post. He joined the Globe in 1956 –his father was editor
of the paper whom the younger Winship replaced in ‘65—and stayed until
his retirement.
Continued... |